Comments on: Flash 9 is codenamed BLAZE http://soenkerohde.com/2005/10/flash-9-is-codenamed-blaze/ Flash Platform (Flash, Flex, AIR) thoughts and examples Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:19:08 +0200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Sönke http://soenkerohde.com/2005/10/flash-9-is-codenamed-blaze/comment-page-1/#comment-318 Sönke Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:54:48 +0000 http://soenkerohde.com/2005/10/11/flash-9-is-codenamed-blaze/#comment-318 No I think it's very good that Macromedia moves fast because there is a big gap between what developers want and how it is currently solved. The most important thing is AS3 and the new Virtual Machine of the Flash Player 8.5 which shall be a few times faster. No I think it’s very good that Macromedia moves fast because there is a big gap between what developers want and how it is currently solved. The most important thing is AS3 and the new Virtual Machine of the Flash Player 8.5 which shall be a few times faster.

]]> By: somaboy http://soenkerohde.com/2005/10/flash-9-is-codenamed-blaze/comment-page-1/#comment-317 somaboy Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:46:35 +0000 http://soenkerohde.com/2005/10/11/flash-9-is-codenamed-blaze/#comment-317 Is it possible that Macromedia is moving a little to fast here? I assume this quick evolution is due in part to the upcoming competition from MicroSoft, but with this course MM is risking to alienate some of its user base. Especially the ones who are just getting started with ActionScript. For myself, I'm quite content with ActionSCript 2.0 the way it stands. Sure a few enhancements here and there, some minor syntactic adjustments and added functionality are always wellcome - but another major overhaul is too much of a good thing for me right now... .soma Is it possible that Macromedia is moving a little to fast here? I assume this quick evolution is due in part to the upcoming competition from MicroSoft, but with this course MM is risking to alienate some of its user base. Especially the ones who are just getting started with ActionScript.

For myself, I’m quite content with ActionSCript 2.0 the way it stands. Sure a few enhancements here and there, some minor syntactic adjustments and added functionality are always wellcome – but another major overhaul is too much of a good thing for me right now…

.soma

]]>